Limited survey responses reveal lack of clarity and consistency
Earlier this year, EFTTA launched a short survey to better understand how Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and fishing line recycling are implemented across Europe.
The number of responses was limited. However, this in itself sends a clear signal: EPR remains a complex and not well-understood topic across the sector.
A limited response, but a clear message
With only a small number of replies, the survey does not provide a complete picture. Yet the outcome is telling. Despite EPR being mandatory under EU law, there is still significant uncertainty within the industry about how schemes work in practice, what costs apply, and what obligations companies actually face.
This lack of clarity is linked both to broadly framed EU legislation and, importantly, to inconsistent national implementation. In many cases, several of the practical issues identified could already be addressed at national level if the political will and administrative guidance were in place, without the need to amend EU legislation.
Differences across countries
The responses confirm a widely shared experience: EPR implementation differs significantly from one country to another.
Differences were noted in:
-
collection systems and access points
-
cost structures and fee allocation
-
scope of products covered
-
treatment and destination of collected waste
This fragmentation makes it difficult for companies operating across borders to understand and comply with their obligations.
Fishing line recycling: potential, but no clear framework
The survey also explored the potential for fishing line recycling, building on the experience of the Anglers National Line Recycling Scheme (ANLRS) in the UK.
While there is clear interest, responses indicate that:
-
there is no consistent European approach
-
links with existing EPR schemes are unclear
-
practical implementation varies widely
At the same time, existing initiatives show that such schemes can deliver both environmental benefits and positive visibility for the sector.
A system that remains difficult to navigate
Overall, the survey points to a broader issue: EPR for fishing tackle remains complex, fragmented and difficult to navigate, even for those directly concerned.
A significant part of this complexity stems from the way EPR rules are interpreted and applied at national level. Greater consistency, clearer guidance and stronger political commitment in Member States could already resolve many of the current challenges.
Without this, there is a risk that the system becomes inefficient and burdensome, without delivering its full environmental potential
Next steps: EPR Webinar
EFTTA will use these initial findings to further clarify the situation and support the sector. The => survey remains open, and additional input from members and stakeholders is still welcome to help build a clearer picture of how EPR works in practice across Europe.
The main focus will now be on continuing the discussion with members and stakeholders, and identifying practical ways to improve understanding of EPR across Europe.
As a next step, EFTTA therefore plans to organise a webinar (July or September) to share practical insights, experiences from different countries, and concrete tips to help companies better understand and navigate EPR requirements.
Preregister
Stakeholders interested to attend this webinar are invited to => pre-register here.
